Lifelong Ranger fans have experienced more agony than triumph. We are constantly teased with “wait until next year,” “a bat away,” “look at all this pitching coming,” “DVD,” etc. For a while now, the organization has pointed to 2010 as the breakout year. With Hicks selling the team, young talent beginning to blossom, and a strong season in ’09, many prognosticators believe 2010 will be the Rangers’ year to claim the West. Nolan Ryan expects it, Josh Hamilton predicts it, local writers seem to hope for it. So will this be the fourth season the Rangers make the playoffs?
According to the late Johnny Oates, in order to make the playoffs, the starting rotation for a MLB team must average 15 wins per starter. In other words, a team’s starters should win 75 games. That total allows the bullpen realistically to pick up additional wins which will put the team into the playoffs. Looking over the stats of the three playoff teams, he’s pretty much right on. In 1996, the starting rotation (Hill, Pavlik, Witt, Oliver, Gross, and Burkett) had 77 wins, or 15.4 wins per pitcher in a 5 man rotation. That was arguably the best Ranger team in the last 20 years. The 1998 starters (Helling, Sele, Burkett, Oliver, Loaiza, Witt, and Stottlemeyer) won 71 games and the 1999 bunch (Helling, Sele, Burkett, Morgan, Clark, Loaiza, Glynn) won only 67. While those two teams won the division, the team was swept in the playoffs both years.
Last year, the starters earned 71 victories, but did not make the playoffs. While that 71 matches the 1998 team and exceeds the 1999 team, the West is much better now than it was 10 years ago. So I think Oates’ assessment that a good team will have 5 starters averaging 15 wins each is a good indicator of the team’s success. How will our starters fair this year? Here are my predictions:
Feldman – 16 wins. He had 17 wins last year. He may match that again, but I think he will be lucky to. While I can easily see him barely reaching 10, I’ll give him the benefit of the doubt that he has found his groove.
Harden – 10 wins. In the past, Harden has been a great pitcher when healthy. However, he is never healthy. This spring, he has looked awful. I don’t expect much from him. Ten wins may be too optimistic. Hopefully, Nolan Ryan’s endurance will rub off on him, but I am not too hopeful.
Wilson – 8 wins. I have no confidence at all in this guy. He’ll pitch all year, so I assume he’ll pick up a few wins, but he will end the year with more losses than victories. 8-13.
Harrison – 8 wins. Will he stay healthy? Is he any good? I see him as a .500 pitcher.
Lewis – 7 wins. Are we really thinking a guy who had to go to Japan to find a job is suddenly going to be a great MLB pitcher?
Hunter – 12 wins. Hopefully he will get healthy and get back in the rotation soon, probably replacing a hurt Harden, an ineffective Wilson, or Lewis. He may be the team’s second best pitcher, but is currently hurt.
Total wins for starters: 61. Well short of Oates’ 75. Other spot starters might up this total to 65 or so, but still, I see the rotation short of ’09 totals and not strong enough to compete with Seattle or the Angels.
The shakiness of the rotation is only part of the problem. Kinsler is on the DL already. The catching situation is unsettled. Will Hamilton, Vlad, and Young hold up? Will Andrus have a sophomore slump? Will Chris Davis spend all year in the majors? Last year was exciting, and I am excited to see how they do this year, but realistically, I don’t see a winning team. Perhaps once the sale is official, the team can make a move or two to improve. Much will be answered in the first 20 games. Ron Washington’s teams have started slow every season. They (especially Washington) cannot afford a 7-13 start.
I am ready for the season and hope that in September I can look back at this post and be so wrong. But from my amateur assessment, I see the Rangers finishing 3rd in the division with an 79-83 record. Even so, I will be cheering for them all the way.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
6 comments:
i think that win mark is too old school. would like to see a statistical study over the last 10 years and how many wins came from starting pitching. a quality start now is considered 6 innings of 3 run ball. a good american league era is anything below 4.20. therefore, i'd think the starter gets the no decision a lot of the time. last year, the WS winning Yankees only had starters win 66 games (at the most - guys like philip hughes and joba started and came out of the bullpen and their wins didn't specify which role but i doubt hughes won 7 games in his 7 starts or else he'd never end the season in the bullpen - in reality might be closer to 60 games).
i think you underestimate CJ. his stuff is much more apt to start than relieve. he's had a sub 1 WHIP this spring. wins/losses are unpredictable but i think he'll have a lot of 'quality' starts. i expect feldman to slip a little. his babip was insane last year and was definitely on the lucky side (.274 vs league avg of .299 = WOW).
i think people are undestimating harden too. not just cause i drafted him. i think he's too talented to be as terrible as he's been this spring.
one thing you forget about last year was how mediocre the offense was. scored 117 runs less than in 2008. hamilton can't be as bad as he was last year. andrus will be better. vlad is an upgrade. he's not vlad of old but he still hits the ball all over the field. chris davis had a great spring and a strong end to last season after he figured some things out. i'm not saying we're going to make the playoffs, but i'm more optimistic than you.
i'll say 84-78.
one bit of trivia - i believe the '99 rangers actually had 2 20-game winners in sele and little ricky helling. so that was 2/3 of their starters' wins. doesn't say much for the 3 revolving doors at the end of the rotation does it
On the 99 team, not two 20 game winners. One had 20 and one had 18 I think. Whereas you are looking at all the questionmarks (health, 2nd year slumps, first time starters, Harden's history(I had him last year)) and seeing the positive, I am looking at it and seeing then egative for sure. Maybe it's my way of not getting my hopes up. There are just too many "hopefully"s on this team. If they all do well, then yes, I would say I underestimate them.
you're right. one, it was '98 and helling had 20 and sele 19. always thought they both had 20. huh
"i think you underestimate CJ. his stuff is much more apt to start than relieve. he's had a sub 1 WHIP this spring. wins/losses are unpredictable but i think he'll have a lot of 'quality' starts. i expect feldman to slip a little. his babip was insane last year and was definitely on the lucky side (.274 vs league avg of .299 = WOW). "
i definitely nailed it with this paragraph . . not so much my next paragraph on harden - although he has shown flashes of brilliance . . .just completely overshadowed by wildness.
anyway, i think it's time for an updated rangers post and your outlook on the remainder of the year and a potential postseason.
the pitchers you were talking about seemed pretty good.
Christian Louboutin uk, Christian Louboutin shoes, nfl hoodies jerseys,nhl hoodies jerseys,nba hoodies jerseys, 2015 hot jerseys, Christian Louboutin Outlet
Post a Comment